Accept All Cookies
This is the fourth in our series of briefings on MiFID and MiFIR. Below, we describe the proposed changes to the current client classification regime, and in particular, amendments to the regime for transactions with ‘eligible counterparties’. We will also discuss the introduction of a new concept of regulated ‘organised trading facilities’.
1. MiFID Annex II (Treatment of local authorities and municipalities): Municipalities and local public authorities are now excluded from the list of per se professional clients and would therefore automatically be treated as retail clients. However, the proposed rules allow them to waive this protection and be treated as professional clients if they satisfy certain requirements, which Member States will set out in delegated legislation.
2. MiFID Article 30 (Conduct of business requirements for eligible counterparties): The overarching high-level requirement for investment firms to act honestly, fairly and professionally and the obligation to be fair, clear and not misleading is proposed to be extended to dealings with eligible counterparties.
Investment firms entering into transactions with eligible counterparties will now be obliged to provide their clients with (i) information on issues such as proposed investment strategies, execution venues and costs and associated charges1 and (ii) reports on the services provided, in particular, periodic communications in light of factors such as the complexity of the financial instruments involved.2 These obligations will apply to the relevant transaction and any ancillary service directly related to the transaction.
1. MiFIR Article 2(7) (Definition): “any system or facility, which is not a regulated market or MTF, operated by an investment firm or a market operator, in which multiple third-party buying and selling interests in financial instruments are able to interact in the system in a way that results in a contract in accordance with the provisions of MiFID.”
2. MiFID Article 20(2) (Authorisation): OTFs must apply for authorisation and in their request, explain in detail why the system does not correspond to and is unable to operate as either a regulated market, an MTF or a systematic internaliser.
3. MiFID Article 20(1) (Segregation): Investment firms operating OTFs will not be able to execute client orders against their own proprietary capital, and must not act as systemic internalisers of OTFs that they operate. Additionally, OTFs are banned from connecting with other OTFs in a way which enables orders in different OTFs to interact.
4. MiFID Article 20(3) (Conduct of Business): OTFs will be subject to various conduct of business rules, including the same transparency, reporting, best execution and client order handling requirements which apply to regulated markets and MTFs.3