Subscribe
Quorum - May 2024
May 9, 2024
Partner | Global Litigation
Associate | Global Litigation

On April 12, 2024, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P., vacating a Second Circuit judgment that had reinstated claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 based on an issuer’s alleged failure to disclose business risks posed by an environmental regulation.  The Supreme Court held that the Second Circuit erred in holding that a violation of Item 303 of Regulation S-K, which requires disclosure of known trends or uncertainties that may materially impact results, may serve as the basis for a Rule 10b-5 claim.  The Court reasoned that Rule 10b-5(b) prohibits false statements and lies, as well as “half-truths”; it does not prohibit “pure omissions.”

Macquarie marks a tightening of standards in the Second Circuit, which for almost a decade stood alone in sustaining Rule 10b-5 claims based on Item 303 nondisclosure, even absent an affirmative misleading statement.   On the other hand, Macquarie will not eliminate Item 303-based Rule 10b-5 claims, which will persist where the nondisclosure renders “statements made” misleading. 

Read More »

Partner | Global Litigation
Partner | Global Litigation
Associate | Global Litigation

On April 4, 2024, the Delaware Supreme Court issued a much-anticipated decision, In re Match Group Derivative Litigation (“In re Match Group”), extending the MFW doctrine more broadly to all conflicted controller transactions.  In Kahn v. M & F Worldwide Corp. (“MFW”), the Delaware Supreme Court first provided a framework for freeze-out mergers to receive business-judgment review if the transaction is subject to (1) approval by an independent special committee and (2) an uncoerced, fully informed vote by minority stockholders.  Since the framework was established in 2014, however, debate has swirled as to whether MFW applied only to freeze-out mergers, where a controlling stockholder takes a company private, or all conflicted controller transactions.

The Match case continues the recent trend of Delaware courts expanding the MFW doctrine beyond its original applicability in squeeze-out mergers.  The Court’s decision underscores the heightened focus companies and boards should afford special committees if they wish to avail themselves of business judgment review.   

Read More »

Associate | Corporate
Special Counsel | Corporate

On March 28, 2024, the Council of the Corporation Law Section of the Delaware State Bar Association approved legislation proposing to amend the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) in response to recent Delaware Court of Chancery decisions. The proposed amendments will be introduced to Delaware’s General Assembly for consideration and, if enacted, will grant more deference for boards of directors to act consistent with current market practice, after Delaware courts recently held that a strict reading of the DGCL did not permit such behavior in certain contexts. The proposed amendments generally focus on three areas, as summarized below.

Read More »

Special Counsel | Corporate
Associate | Corporate

On April 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury announced a notice of proposed rulemaking that would expand the enforcement authority of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS” or the “Committee”).  If implemented, the proposal’s main impact will be to empower the Committee in its engagement with transaction parties before, during, and after the Committee’s review of a transaction.

Read More »

Counsel | Antitrust
Special Counsel | Corporate

The FTC recently issued a final rule banning noncompete clauses nationwide. Uncertainty with respect to whether the FTC can sustain the rule, after judicial review, makes it likely that states and localities will continue to legislate and regulate on this issue.

Read More »

Key Contacts

 

Richard M. Brand
Co-Chair
T. +1 212 504 5757
richard.brand@cwt.com

William P. Mills
Co-Chair
T. +1 212 504 6436
william.mills@cwt.com

Stephen Fraidin
Partner
T. +1 212 504 6600
stephen.fraidin@cwt.com

Erica Hogan
Partner
T. +1 212 504 6645
erica.hogan@cwt.com

Kiran S. Kadekar
Partner
T. +1 212 504 6404
kiran.kadekar@cwt.com

Andrew J. O'Brien
Partner
T. +1 212 504 6414
andrew.obrien@cwt.com

Gregory P. Patti
Partner
T. +1 212 504 6780
greg.patti@cwt.com

Michael D. Pinnisi
Partner
T. +1 212 504 6413
michael.pinnisi@cwt.com

Daniel P. Raglan
Partner
T. +1 212 504 6790
daniel.raglan@cwt.com

Nick Ramphal
Partner
T. +1 212 504 6049
nick.ramphal@cwt.com

Joanna Valentine
Partner
T. +44 (0) 20 7170 8640
joanna.valentine@cwt.com

 

Peter F. Bariso
Special Counsel
T. +1 212 504 6535
peter.bariso@cwt.com

Richard Rowe
Special Counsel
T. +1 212 504 6534
richard.rowe@cwt.com

© 2024 | Notices | Manage Subscription | Contacts